On acoustic guitars It can sound pretty great if you careful with position so you can loose most of the hi end fizzy and get a really clean honest sound. This review is of the original Rode NT1 not the NT1A also note that manufacturer of the diaphragms changed some years before the NT1a was released. On guitar amps the mic grabs all frequencies but doesn't realy pump like a dynamic it tends to cream the sound out a bit with a little fizzyness I can work on cleans but results are ok. The spec is 135db spl, 48v phantom power needed, FET Preamp, excellent build quality. I've had one of these for years. This mic measures 10” long and weighs 163 grams. When I got it there were very few affordable LDCs on the market and this one was getting pretty good reviews due to the lack of competition. Rode tells us that every element of the NTR, from the transformer to the ribbon element itself, has been designed and created in-house, and that the ribbon, at 1.8 microns, is one of the … We had this mic over the timbalas in our studio for about a year before we switched our set up. Sure the NT1 has kind of congested highs but still works good on a lot of things. This was the first LDC I ever bought and I still use it occasionally, although now I have a locker full of more expensive mics. The earlier model being the most preferred of the lot I have used all three and own the original and the mk2 to put a name to it. I hardly ever use this mic. There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. I heard some tracks with it on a thin-voiced lady singer. The Rode NT3 is a condenser instrument mic that’s pretty thin and stylish. Both models have the same externally polarized (“true” condenser) capsule style. It also comes in a nice little pouch so it doesn’t get dinged up. No idea if its better or worse. The mic comes new with a double walled hard plastic case that is lined deeply with foam and a small section for the mic clip. Seems like a wannabe Neumann U47 very timber midrange focus while the NT1-A is brighter and more prominent sounding. An internal capsule shock mounting system keeps handling noise down. The overall frequency response of the NT1 is flatter, while the NT1a has that spiked high end that to me just sounds nasty. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. -The hi frequencies on this mic if pushed sound very unnatural so be care full the rest is very well balanced and warm. It kinda likes a high alto or high tener that doesn't have to much natural ess themselves. Rode NTG3, on the other hand, like all professional shotguns has no issues with high humidity. -There's no pads or roll offs a -10 pad would make this mic so much more handy for louder sounds sources such as kick close micing. he uses a wind screen on it and honestly his audio is pretty bad and hes obviously not too concerned about. Some times this will suck ess out of nowhere and whack it on top of you sound. - it's has warm low mids that work great on acoustic instruments mainly acoustic guitar, vocals and drums. he was using the blue spark before lol. you know, the worlds msotp opular youtuber who plays video games. Maybe some day I'll actually need a sibilance exaggerator for something. Build and setup. Like all Rode … It also likes a consistent timbred singer not an edgy shouty quite singer. RØDE Microphones announces the new NT1 microphone. It's easy to say after watching that video (made by Rode btw and I don't think they are shady but it's still an add and is not objective), the only conclusion I could ever make from watching that video is that an NT1 may be worth considering. I have no experience with the NT1-A. is it as good as a U47? - I'm assuming this mic compresses well and records acoustic instruments (epecially drum room mics) that it must have a pretty good transiesnt response as it seems to keep its clarity at most frequencies except 60hz and below and around 10kz up. Hey there! This review is of the original Rode NT1 not the NT1A also note that manufacturer of the diaphragms changed some years before the NT1a was released. The shock mount was an optional extra but they take any generic ldc shock mount. I've been thinking about getting it Joly modded for a while now, but every time I see stuff like this I change my mind. lolz. A gold dot denotes the front of the mic, the grille is made up of 2 to sorts of mesh the thick and more structural and another thin mesh that probably helps out on the shielding front. It goes straight into my Ensemble Thunderbolt, and makes for one hell of a clean signal path into PT. Don't much care. The No.1 Website for Pro Audio ; The No.1 Website for Pro Audio. - it responds well to compression really well and if you ever want that super crushed comp effect these mics will let you do it without loosing to much detail and lows, it cuts off the sometimes troublesome hi's but the hi mids make up for it and get all crunchy and pumpin. It also comes in a nice little pouch so it doesn’t get dinged up. The amount of people who could compare a U47 to a sub $300 mic, likely almost non existent. I personally preder the more lively NT1-A sound so I was immediately turned off of the NT1's sound. but ya... what do you guys think of it. RODE NT3 … Even if you have the money, you can't just go out and buy a U47 so anyone who says anything likely has no clue. The Rode NT3 is a condenser instrument mic that’s pretty thin and stylish. If you look around for the right mic (this one) you be able to grab one around £80 with a case and shockmount and that's been the going rate on ebay, gumtree, craigslist and sos readers ads. -The cardiode polar is actually pretty tight at quite a few frequencies so you can pickup the sound your after or not-after, so you have a good amount of control over your bleed. Obviously you can't buy them new anymore. The NT3 is superior to both of these. It has a simple but durable design, no LEDs nor switches to be found. There is a big difference in sound between the mics and the one I 'm reviewing I would say it is much better and a comparison would double this posts size. They can be great on some vocs and terrible on others. So the sound, well this mic generally has clear mids that seem to have a good amount of detail. The original can be distinguished by their white body with a black ring around the bottom of the mic containing the serial number, rode and made in australia. The new modern mk3 version if you like, cost anything from £130 to £150 now. This mic retailed new for £329 in 1997. load) so you have to carefully choose who/what you use em on and how. Works great for acoustic bass. If you find a female singer that naturally doesn't have to much ess this mic can sometimes be THE mic. But they do actually make a pretty good pair/ mono overheads and where i found them to be best at was drum room mics. So I've listened to the Black Rode NT1. The RODE NT3 incorporates a rugged welded and heat-treated mesh head and all metal … The earlier model being the most preferred of the lot I have used all three and own the original and the mk2 to put a name to it. If you think of using the mics as drum overheads be aware that their max spl is 135dB SPL (@ 1kHz, 1% THD into 1K? The sibilance is just too annoying for me. The amount of people who can objectively compare a U47 to any modern sub $2000 mic is smaller. The amount of people who can objectively compare a U47 to anything is very small. For this review, I received a single NT4 and a matched pair of NT5s. NAMM 2014: Slate Digital Introduces The VIRTUAL MICROPHONE SYSTEM, Already have an account?

Killifish Temperature Celsius, Prototype For Railway Reservation System, Lebonheur Nursing Internship, Low Carb Crackers, Hotel Reservation System Design, Apartments For Rent In Bangor, Maine, Piano Lessons For Adults, Acer Nitro 5 Sale, Rode Ntg3 Price, Microsoft Office Icons Missing Windows 7,